Supported via arm's length funding from Gilead.

Highlights from

SABCS 2021

San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium

San Antonio, Texas, 7 - 10 December 2021

Updated overall survival results from the phase III PHOEBE trial in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer

Take-home messages
  • At ~2.5 years' follow-up, pyrotinib plus capecitabine demonstrated improved OS compared with lapatinib plus capecitabine in patients with HER2+ mBC after trastuzumab and chemotherapy
  • The benefits of pyrotinib plus capecitabine were consistent in most clinically relevant subgroups
  • Trial results suggest that pyrotinib plus capecitabine could be an appropriate treatment option in this patient population
"In conclusion, with extended follow-up, pyrotinib plus capecitabine demonstrated statistically significant OS improvement compared with lapatinib plus capecitabine in patients with HER2+ mBC after trastuzumab and chemotherapy"

Dr Binghe Xu, Professor and Director of the Department of Medical Oncology at the Cancer Hospital and Institute, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China

At this year's San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS), Dr Binghe Xu from the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences presented updated overall survival (OS) results from the phase III, open-label, randomised, controlled PHOEBE trial in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC).

"In [the] second-line setting, T-DM1 [trastuzumab emtansine] after trastuzumab-based therapy is the preferred regimen recommended by international treatment guidelines" commented Dr Xu, "however, in some countries, T-DM1 has not been approved for use in [the] metastatic setting in all countries and regions worldwide; country-specific issues should be considered."

Pyrotinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets EGFR, HER2 and HER4. Pyrotinib in combination with capecitabine has previously demonstrated clinically meaningful benefits and acceptable tolerability in patients with HER2+ mBC who had been treated with taxanes, anthracycline and/or trastuzumab (phase II).1

The PHOEBE trial included patients with pathologically confirmed HER2+ mBC who had been treated with trastuzumab, taxanes and/or anthracyclines. Patients were eligible if they had received up to two prior lines of chemotherapy for mBC, had at least one measurable lesion and had an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. The study population was randomised 1:1 to receive pyrotinib + capecitabine (n=134) or lapatinib + capecitabine (n=133).

Stratification factors in the study were hormone receptor status (ER- and/or PR+ versus ER- and PR-) and the number of prior lines of chemotherapy for mBC (≤1 versus 2).

At the interim analysis data cut-off (March 2019), progression-free survival per BICR (primary endpoint) was longer in the pyrotinib group versus the lapatinib group (12.5 versus 6.8 months, HR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.27-0.56, p<0.0001). OS data were not mature at this stage.2 Dr Xu noted that, in July 2020, these results led to the approval of pyrotinib in combination with capecitabine as second-line standard of care treatment in HER2+ mBC in China.

He then moved on to describe the updated OS analysis findings, with a median follow-up of 33.2 months for the pyrotinib group and 31.8 months in the lapatinib group. In the pyrotinib group, median OS was not reached and in the lapatinib group it was 26.9 months. Pyrotinib demonstrated an OS benefit versus lapatinib with a hazard ratio of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.48-0.98, p=0.02). At 2 years, the OS rates were 66.6% and 58.8% in the pyrotinib and lapatinib groups, respectively. This benefit was consistent across all subgroups:

  • No trastuzumab resistance: HR: 0.60 (95% CI: 0.39-0.91)
  • Trastuzumab resistance: HR: 0.94 (95% CI: 0.48-1.85)
  • No prior chemotherapy: HR: 0.72 (95% CI: 0.38-1.35)
  • One line of prior chemotherapy: HR: 0.73 (95% CI: 0.44-1.22)
  • Two lines of prior chemotherapy: HR: 0.56 (95% CI: 0.24-1.32)

Investigator-assessed median PFS also consistently improved with pyrotinib (12.5 months) versus lapatinib (5.6 months) with a hazard ratio of 0.48 (95% CI: 0.37-0.63), p<0.0001. The PFS benefit was, once again, consistent across all subgroups:

  • No trastuzumab resistance: HR: 0.44 (95% CI: 0.32-0.61)
  • Trastuzumab resistance: HR: 0.58 (95% CI: 0.35-0.98)
  • No prior chemotherapy: HR: 0.47 (95% CI: 0.30-0.74)
  • One line of prior chemotherapy: HR: 0.49 (95% CI: 0.32-0.73)
  • Two lines of prior chemotherapy: HR: 0.56 (95% CI: 0.28-1.08)

"In conclusion, with extended follow-up, pyrotinib plus capecitabine demonstrated statistically significant OS improvement compared with lapatinib plus capecitabine in patients with HER2+ mBC after trastuzumab and chemotherapy" stated Dr Xu, "the benefits of pyrotinib plus capecitabine were observed in most clinically relevant subgroups for both OS and PFS. This updated analysis of OS in the PHOEBE trial reaffirmed pyrotinib plus capecitabine as an established treatment option in this patient population."

BICR: Blinded Independent Central Review; CI: confidence interval; ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; EGFR: epidermal growth factor receptor; ER: oestrogen receptor; HER: human epidermal growth factor receptor; PR: progesterone receptor

Based on:
Xu B, Yan M et al. Updated overall survival (OS) results from the phase 3 PHOEBE trial of pyrotinib versus lapatinib in combination with capecitabine in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (abstract GS3-02). Presented on Thursday 9 December 2021

References:

  1. Ma F, Ouyang Q et al. Pyrotinib or lapatinib combined with capecitabine in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer with prior taxanes, anthracyclines, and/or trastuzumab: a randomized, phase II study. J Clin Oncol 2019;37(29):2610-2619
  2. Xu B, Yan M et al. Pyrotinib plus capecitabine versus lapatinib plus capecitabine for the treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (PHOEBE): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2021;22(3):351-360

Top image: rustycloud

Article image: jxfzsy

The content and interpretation of these conference highlights are the views and comments of the speakers/ authors.

Supported by